ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:PDF , 页数:2 ,大小:432.92KB ,
资源ID:12670    下载:注册后免费下载
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。 如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【https://www.wenkunet.com/d-12670.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录   QQ登录   微博登录 

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(【历史语言研究所集刊】77-1-2.pdf)为本站会员(李静文)主动上传,文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知文库网(发送邮件至13560552955@163.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

【历史语言研究所集刊】77-1-2.pdf

1、中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊 第七十七本,第一分 出版日期:民國九十五年三月 -33- 漢代今、古學的制之分 以廖平今古學考為討中心 郜積意*漢代今、古學的實質性分歧,在近代學者廖平的今古學考中被歸納為禮制的問題,即今學主先王禮,古學主周禮。廖氏並以王制、周禮分別為今、古學之總綱。這一認識是建立在廖氏研究許慎五經異義,以及穀梁傳與禮記王制相闡發的基礎上,並對後世經學産生了深遠影響。不過,廖平以穀梁為春秋別傳、素王改制之書,以及有關王制的論述卻包含了諸多邏輯問題,其主要原因是不以何休公羊禮作為今學禮的代表。本文通過今古學考、許慎五經異義及何休公羊禮的相互比照,一方面認為廖平以禮制分今、古,深具創

2、見,另一方面也認為,今、古學的禮制之分,不僅如其所言,今學主先王禮,古學主周禮,而且,今學也主周禮,今、古學在周禮觀的歧異是不容忽視的現象。文章進一步以公羊禮為基礎對許慎的五經異義重作分析,以表明區分今、古學應以何休公羊禮為據。並進而認為,探討漢代今、古學家的先王禮和周禮觀,對於理解漢代今、古學的實質性分歧,將開闢新的途徑。 關鍵詞:廖平 今古學考 今文學 古文學 制 *北京大學中文系博士後研究人員 漢代今、古學的禮制之分以廖平今古學考為討論中心 -77- Distinguishing the Ritual Systems of the Han Dynastys Old and New Tex

3、ts: Liao Pings Jin Gu Xue Kao as a Focus for Discussion Jiyi Gao Department of Chinese, Peking University In Jin Gu Xue Kao 今古學考, modern scholar Liao Ping views the essential difference between the New Text and the Old Text of the Han Dynasty as a question of ritual system: the New Text emphasizes t

4、he ritual system of the ancient sage sovereigns, while the Old Text emphasizes the Rites of Zhou. In addition, Liao uses Wangzhi 王制 and Zhouli 周 as the general principle for the New and Old Texts respectively. This understanding is based on Liaos research of Xu Shens explication of Differences betwe

5、en the Five Classics 五經義, Guliangzhuan 穀傳, and Wangzhi, and has greatly influenced the study of Confucian classics of later generations. However, Liao Pings view of Guliangzhuan as unofficial commentaries of Chunqiu 春秋, the book on Confucian reforms, and theories about Wangzhi contain various logica

6、l problems, the main reason being that He Xius Gongyang 公羊 rites are not viewed as representative of the New Text ritual rites. This paper compares Jin Gu Xue Kao, Xu Shens Differences between the Five Classics and He Xius Gongyang rites. On one hand, the author believes that Liao Pings use of ritua

7、l forms to distinguish between the Old and New Texts is profoundly original. On the other hand, the author also believes that the distinction between the ritual forms of the Old and New Texts is not merely that the New Text emphasizes the rites of the ancient sovereigns while the Old Text emphasizes

8、 the Rites of Zhou: the New Text also emphasizes the Rites of Zhou. The distinction between the Old and New Texts concerning their views on the Rites of Zhou is a phenomenon which must not be overlooked. Furthermore, using the Gongyang rites as a foundation, this article re-analyzes Xu Shens Differe

9、nces between the Five Classics, clearly indicating that the Old and New Text studies should use He Xius Gongyang rites as textual evidence. Finally, this article explores how the Old and New Text scholars of the Han Dynasty viewed the ritual system of the ancient sage sovereigns and the Rites of Zhou. This approach opens a new path for understanding the essential differences between the Old and New Text studies of the Han Dynasty. Keywords: Liao Ping, Jin Gu Xue Kao 今古學考, New Texts, Old Texts, the ritual system

本站链接:文库   一言   我酷   合作


客服QQ:2549714901微博号:文库网官方知乎号:文库网

经营许可证编号: 粤ICP备2021046453号世界地图

文库网官网©版权所有2025营业执照举报