收藏 分享(赏)

【历史语言研究所集刊】77-1-2.pdf

上传人:李静文 文档编号:12670 上传时间:2018-06-05 格式:PDF 页数:2 大小:432.92KB
下载 相关 举报
【历史语言研究所集刊】77-1-2.pdf_第1页
第1页 / 共2页
【历史语言研究所集刊】77-1-2.pdf_第2页
第2页 / 共2页
亲,该文档总共2页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

1、中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊 第七十七本,第一分 出版日期:民國九十五年三月 -33- 漢代今、古學的制之分 以廖平今古學考為討中心 郜積意*漢代今、古學的實質性分歧,在近代學者廖平的今古學考中被歸納為禮制的問題,即今學主先王禮,古學主周禮。廖氏並以王制、周禮分別為今、古學之總綱。這一認識是建立在廖氏研究許慎五經異義,以及穀梁傳與禮記王制相闡發的基礎上,並對後世經學産生了深遠影響。不過,廖平以穀梁為春秋別傳、素王改制之書,以及有關王制的論述卻包含了諸多邏輯問題,其主要原因是不以何休公羊禮作為今學禮的代表。本文通過今古學考、許慎五經異義及何休公羊禮的相互比照,一方面認為廖平以禮制分今、古,深具創

2、見,另一方面也認為,今、古學的禮制之分,不僅如其所言,今學主先王禮,古學主周禮,而且,今學也主周禮,今、古學在周禮觀的歧異是不容忽視的現象。文章進一步以公羊禮為基礎對許慎的五經異義重作分析,以表明區分今、古學應以何休公羊禮為據。並進而認為,探討漢代今、古學家的先王禮和周禮觀,對於理解漢代今、古學的實質性分歧,將開闢新的途徑。 關鍵詞:廖平 今古學考 今文學 古文學 制 *北京大學中文系博士後研究人員 漢代今、古學的禮制之分以廖平今古學考為討論中心 -77- Distinguishing the Ritual Systems of the Han Dynastys Old and New Tex

3、ts: Liao Pings Jin Gu Xue Kao as a Focus for Discussion Jiyi Gao Department of Chinese, Peking University In Jin Gu Xue Kao 今古學考, modern scholar Liao Ping views the essential difference between the New Text and the Old Text of the Han Dynasty as a question of ritual system: the New Text emphasizes t

4、he ritual system of the ancient sage sovereigns, while the Old Text emphasizes the Rites of Zhou. In addition, Liao uses Wangzhi 王制 and Zhouli 周 as the general principle for the New and Old Texts respectively. This understanding is based on Liaos research of Xu Shens explication of Differences betwe

5、en the Five Classics 五經義, Guliangzhuan 穀傳, and Wangzhi, and has greatly influenced the study of Confucian classics of later generations. However, Liao Pings view of Guliangzhuan as unofficial commentaries of Chunqiu 春秋, the book on Confucian reforms, and theories about Wangzhi contain various logica

6、l problems, the main reason being that He Xius Gongyang 公羊 rites are not viewed as representative of the New Text ritual rites. This paper compares Jin Gu Xue Kao, Xu Shens Differences between the Five Classics and He Xius Gongyang rites. On one hand, the author believes that Liao Pings use of ritua

7、l forms to distinguish between the Old and New Texts is profoundly original. On the other hand, the author also believes that the distinction between the ritual forms of the Old and New Texts is not merely that the New Text emphasizes the rites of the ancient sovereigns while the Old Text emphasizes

8、 the Rites of Zhou: the New Text also emphasizes the Rites of Zhou. The distinction between the Old and New Texts concerning their views on the Rites of Zhou is a phenomenon which must not be overlooked. Furthermore, using the Gongyang rites as a foundation, this article re-analyzes Xu Shens Differe

9、nces between the Five Classics, clearly indicating that the Old and New Text studies should use He Xius Gongyang rites as textual evidence. Finally, this article explores how the Old and New Text scholars of the Han Dynasty viewed the ritual system of the ancient sage sovereigns and the Rites of Zhou. This approach opens a new path for understanding the essential differences between the Old and New Text studies of the Han Dynasty. Keywords: Liao Ping, Jin Gu Xue Kao 今古學考, New Texts, Old Texts, the ritual system

展开阅读全文
相关资源
相关搜索
资源标签

当前位置:首页 > 历史资料 > 中国历史

本站链接:文库   一言   我酷   合作


客服QQ:2549714901微博号:文库网官方知乎号:文库网

经营许可证编号: 粤ICP备2021046453号世界地图

文库网官网©版权所有2025营业执照举报